People v. Mahoney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Sixth District Court, County of Sacramento. Denson, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
The motion to dismiss the appeal was virtually passed upon, and was denied by our predecessors.
The only question upon the merits of the cause relates to the sufficiency of the description of the property assessed, which is as follows : “ 1,013.86 acres of land, being a portion of the San Pedro Rancho, bounded as follows: Rorth, by the lands of James. Regan and others; east, by the line of the San Pedro Rancho ; south, by the Pacific Ocean ; and west, by the lands of Richard Tobin. Also 15 acres of land, being a portion of the San Pedro Rancho, bounded on the north by the lands of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Utica v. MersereauNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
- People v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Amberg v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.