Legal Opinion

Sleight v. Roe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Ejectment by Victoria Sleight against Franklin Roe and Etta Roe. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Action of ejectment to recover from defendants the undivided one-fourth interest in lots 163 and 164, village of Portland. The title to the property is conceded to have been in Joseph Roe at the time of his death, in 1880. At his death he left surviving him his widow, Gertrude Roe, and four children, to wit, Victoria Sleight (plaintiff here), Franklin Roe, William Roe, and Emma Jane Collins, all of whom are now living, except Emma Jane Collins, who has since deceased, leaving one child as her sole heir at law. The defendant Franklin Roe is one of the surviving children of Joseph Roe, and Etta…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Page v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Frentz v. KlotschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Chickering v. FaileIllinois Supreme Court · 1865

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Tyler v. BurgesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Simons v. RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Stansell v. American Radiator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Boissoin v. GillieMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API