Stephan & Sons, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage Zoning Board of Examiners & Appeals
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a superior court decision which upheld a ruling of the Municipality of Anchorage Zoning Board of Examiners and Appeals (the Board). The Board had limited operation of a gravel pit by Stephan & Sons, Inc. (Stephan), appellant, to two separately traeted subparcels totaling thirteen acres of a fifty-three acre parcel. Stephan appeals to this court on the sole issue of whether its authorized “nonconforming use” may be expanded over the entire parcel. We affirm.
I
In 1969, George and Dixie Winningham were the owners of approximately fifty-three acres…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- McCaslin v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- County of Du Page v. Elmhurst-Chicago Stone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Town of Wolfeboro v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.