Legal Opinion
Town of Wolfeboro v. Smith
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 6, 1989No. 87-434PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiff, Town of Wolfeboro (Planning Board) (hereinafter the Town), appeals from an order of the Superior Court {Dickson, J.) denying the imposition of a cease and desist order, based on its finding, upon an agreed statement of facts, that the defendants were entitled to continue excavating their property, under Laws 1979, 481:3, the grandfather clause of RSA chapter 155-E. We reverse and remand.
The defendants are the owners of approximately thirty-five acres of land located in Wolfeboro. Since 1950, when previous owners began excavating the property, an excavation pit has been…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- McCaslin v. City of Monterey ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of ClaremontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.