Legal Opinion

City of University Place v. McGuire

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2001No. 70356-6PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

— Developer Brian McGuire seeks to grade a 1.4-acre knoll as fill for a nearby development. The City of University Place has refused permission. McGuire argues he has a valid nonconforming use right to mine the knoll, as it is historically part of a site owned and operated by his predecessor in interest. University Place argues that the nonconforming use either never accrued to the knoll or, in the alternative, has been abandoned. McGuire urges this Court to adopt the doctrine of diminishing asset, which extends the boundaries of the nonconforming mining use to the entire parcel intended to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Callecod v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Rhod-A-Zalea & 35th, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. City of University Place v. McGuireWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kommavongsa v. HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kommavongsa v. HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Scott's Excavating Vancouver, LLC v. Winlock Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API