Inman v. Elk Cotton Mills
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM LINCOLN. Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Lincoln County. —Walter S. Bearden, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard
*143The complainants in this canse are partners located and doing a cotton business in Atlanta, Georgia, and the defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of cotton goods at Fayetteville, in this State. The present bill is filed to recover the sum of $508.64, which it is alleged has accrued to the complainants from a breach of an executory contract for the sale and purchase of fifty bales of cotton. On the 17th of June, 1904, the defendant sent to the complainants at Atlanta the following telegram: “If at 11% delivered here you can ship Elk Cotton Mills here fifty bales of cotton…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Kadish v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Smith v. Georgia Loan, Savings & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. NaiveTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heery v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Norfolk Hosiery & Underwear Mills v. Aetna Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Bagley & Co. v. Union-Buffalo Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928
- Lagerloef Trading Co. v. American Paper Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- Houston Bros. v. Dickson Planing MillTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.