Legal Opinion
Houston Bros. v. Dickson Planing Mill
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice G-eeen
This is a suit to recover damages for breach of contract. The suit was dismissed by the chancellor and his decree was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. This court has granted the complainants’ petition for certiorari.
The defendant, located at Dickson, Tennessee, in February, 1925, entered into a contract with the complainants, located at Vicksburg, Mississippi, for two hundred thousand feet of lumber at prices stipulated f. o. b. Dickson. The contract provided for inspection according to the rules of the National Hardwood Lumber Association and the answer admits that this, inspection was to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Lamborn & Co. v. Green & GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Wildberg Box Co. v. DarbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- Inman v. Elk Cotton MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Vosburg v. Southern Lumber & Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petway v. Loew's Nashville Knoxville CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- M & M Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Chrysler Capital Corporation, Inc. v. Gmx Communications, Inc. Holder Communications Corporation of Louisiana Holder Communications Corporation Gmx Corporation of Tennessee, Inc. Joe K. Shaw Jack M. Norman Radiosouth of Mississippi, Ltd., Gary Stevens, Receiver-Appellee, Arnold Malkan, by and Through Audrey Malkan, His Successor-In-Interest Ohio Broadcast AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996