United States v. Leroy Kendrick
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the District Court’s decision denying, after hearing, the petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate an illegal sentence on the grounds that the petitioner was incompetent to stand trial. The Government now concedes that this question is properly raised under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956), reversing per curiam, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117, 223 F.2d 582 (1955); Fisher v. United States, 317 F.2d 352 (4 Cir. 1963); Nelms v. United States, 318 F.2d 150 (4 Cir. 1963).
The petitioner, who is forty-four years…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Edward B. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- United States v. B. D. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Martin Joseph McNicholasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Kenneth H. Gunther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. RodoussakisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. (Under Seal)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Jesse Ray PipkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Roland Tyler v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.