Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 31, 1980No. 79-2340PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals a ruling of the district court denying its petition for a Rule to show cause why attorney Carl Walsh should not be held in contempt for refusing to testify before a grand jury and produce records. The district court quashed the subpoenas duces tecum and ad testifican-dum on the ground that compliance would violate the attorney-client privilege. We reverse and remand.
I
This proceeding is another phase in the intrigue surrounding the burglary of the residence of Anthony J. Accardo. As reported in an earlier decision, “some time after the burglary —…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Jesse J. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Hakeem Abdul Rasheed, AKA Clifford Jones, United States of America v. Janice PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Daniel A. White and Judith A. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.