Legal Opinion

Butrum v. Louisville Metropolitan Government

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 13, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00330Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE RACHEAL ELIZABETH ANNE BUTRUM Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-330-RGJ-CHL LOUISVILLE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT Defendant MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Defendant Louisville Metropolitan Government (“Louisville Metro”) moves for partial summary judgment. [DE 61]. Briefing is complete, and the motion is ripe. For the reasons below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 61] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Further, Louisville Metro’s motion for trial date scheduling conference [DE 99] is GRANTED and the parties must to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API