Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Dart Equipment Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1991No. B046303PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Douglas Ladd (plaintiff) appeals from an order of dismissal for failure to serve process within two years. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.420, subd. (a)(1).) The court initially granted the discretionary dismissal motion. Plaintiff filed a reconsideration motion. (§ 1008, subd. (a).) The court granted the reconsideration request and, upon reconsideration, once again granted the dismissal motion. We conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in granting the initial dismissal motion heard on October 9, 1989, and in granting the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Tippett v. TerichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Tustin Plaza Partnership v. WehageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Williams v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API