King v. State Ex Rel. O'reilly, Co. Atty.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McIntosh County; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge Quo warranto by the State, on the relation of E. 1. O’Reilly, County Attorney of McIntosh county, against June B. King et al., officers of consolidated school district No. 1. Judgment for relator and respondents King and Prater bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This is an action in the nature of quo warranto brought in the name of the state, upon relation of the county attorney of McIntosh county, against the officers of consolidated school district No. 1 to test the validity of the organization of consolidated school district No. 1, and to cancel the bonds issued by said district.
The material facts may be summarized as follows: In the month of March, 1910, there was filed with the county superintendent of said county, from school districts Nos,. 24, 45, 29' 63, 30, and part of No. 25, petitions purporting to be signed by more than 50 per cent, of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ryan v. VargaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- School Dist. No. 44, Caddo Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Board of County Commissioners v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Woolsey v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Cleveland v. School Dist. No. 79, Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. Woodford Consolidated School Dist. No. 36Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Davis v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Gregg v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Smith v. State Ex Rel. BarrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- King v. State Ex Rel. GossettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.