da Cunha v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Chief Judge.
We shall hold in this expedited appeal that Md.Code art. 48A, § 589 does not require an automobile liability insurer to pay benefits for lost wages for a period following the death of the insured.
Manuel and Maria Mendes purchased an insurance policy from appellee, insuring their 1989 Toyota. The policy provided coverage up to $10,000 for certain medical expenses and wage losses incurred as the result of an automobile accident, without regard to fault. This kind of coverage, up to $2,500, is required in Maryland by § 539; coverage over that amount is optional. The “loss of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Flanagan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Hamrick Ex Rel. Estate of Hamrick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Ricks v. CoffeltSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.