Legal Opinion

da Cunha v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 4, 1993No. 872Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Chief Judge.

We shall hold in this expedited appeal that Md.Code art. 48A, § 589 does not require an automobile liability insurer to pay benefits for lost wages for a period following the death of the insured.

Manuel and Maria Mendes purchased an insurance policy from appellee, insuring their 1989 Toyota. The policy provided coverage up to $10,000 for certain medical expenses and wage losses incurred as the result of an automobile accident, without regard to fault. This kind of coverage, up to $2,500, is required in Maryland by § 539; coverage over that amount is optional. The “loss of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Flanagan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Hamrick Ex Rel. Estate of Hamrick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  5. Ricks v. CoffeltSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API