Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1958No. Civ. A. 3792PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid, J.

The defendant Smith appeals from a judgment based upon his conviction under Los Angeles Municipal Code, (Ordinance No. 77,000 as amended) pursuant to the complaint which charged that he violated paragraph 2 of section 41.01.1 thereof, in that he “did wilfully and unlawfully . . . have in his possession an obscene and indecent writing, book, pamphlet, picture, photograph and drawing, to wit: Sweeter Than Life, in a place of business where magazines, books, pamphlets, papers and pictures were sold and kept for sale.”

The ordinance provisions in question read in part as follows: “Sec. 41.01.1…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. United States v. KennerleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. OmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API