Legal Opinion

State v. Locks

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1962No. 1206PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

In the second count of a two count direct information defendant Locks was charged with “wilfully and unlawfully” keeping for sale, selling and exhibiting obscene and indecent pictures and written materials in violation of A.R.S. § 13-532 (1956) which provides in pertinent part that :■

“A person is guilty of a misdemeanor who:
“1. Writes, composes, prints, publishes, sells, distributes, keeps for sale, gives, loans or exhibits an obscene or indecent writing, paper or book to any person, or designs, copies, draws, engraves, paints or otherwise prepares an obscene or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  2. State v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Application of GaultArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. LocksArizona Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API