Legal Opinion
State v. Oman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 1, 1961No. 38,383PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The defendant was charged with unlawfully selling and having in his possession, with intent to sell, certain obscene or indecent magazines, pamphlets, or story papers containing pictures and photographs, in violation of Minn. St. 617.24,1 said violation constituting the crime of selling and possessing indecent literature against the form of the statute.
The defendant demurred to the information on the following specific grounds:
*13“(A) That on its face the information does not substantially conform to the requirements of Sec. 628.10 to Sec. 628.13, as qualified by Sec. 628.18, all…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. HershbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- O'CONNOR v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.