Legal Opinion
Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 2, 2014No. A12-2270PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*427OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
Connie L. Gretsch filed a lawsuit against Vantium Capital, Inc. d/b/a Acqura Loan Services (“Acqura”) alleging numerous state common law and statutory claims. Gretsch’s claims arise from Acqura’s alleged violation of its Servicer Participation Agreement with Fannie Mae. Gretsch contends that Acqura violated the agreement by failing to follow guidelines applicable under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program. The sole issue on appeal is whether MinmStat. § 58.18, subd. 1 (2012), provides a private cause of action for Gretsch to pursue damages for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Finn v. Alliance BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Steven L. Wirtz v. Specialized Loan ServicingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.