Legal Opinion
Cruz-Guzman v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 2018No. A16-1265PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Justice.
*4In this appeal, we must decide whether claims alleging that the State has failed to provide students with an adequate education are justiciable. Appellants, who are primarily parents of children enrolled in Minneapolis and Saint Paul public schools, brought a putative class-action complaint on behalf of their children against respondents State of Minnesota and other State entities and officials. Appellants claim that the State has violated the Education, Equal Protection, and Due Process Clauses of the Minnesota Constitution. The State moved to dismiss the complaint on…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Pauley v. KellyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Forslund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Olson v. LeschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- SHEA v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.