Legal Opinion
Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Errett
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 3, 1924No. 229PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, .Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The .decree brings up for consideration two principal questions: (1) Whether on the evidence in this particular case defendant., Errett was guilty of contributory infringement; and (2) whether he would be chargeable with contributory infringement, if he did other acts prohibited and restrained by the decree. The second question will be first considered.
The fundamental facts are that defendant’s Lily cup is an article in commerce of ordinary use, being a paper cup for drinking purposes which can be úsed without any relation to any…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Victor Talking MacH. Co. v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Precise Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.