Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Precise Mfg. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 8, 1926No. 234, 235PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
These eases will be disposed of in one opinion. Injunctions pendente lite were granted, after argument, supported by affidavits. The patents in suit are the Fessenden heterodyne, No. 1,-050,441, No. 1,050,728, and Armstrong regenerative patent, No. 1,113,149. The Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company is the owner of the patents, and the Radio ■ Corporation of America is the licensee. All the patents have been held valid by this court, and no effort is put forth at this time to have them declared invalid for any reason. See International Signal Co. v. Vreeland…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Armstrong v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. ErrettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co. v. De LavaudCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Electro-Bleaching Gas Co. v. Paradon Engineering Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
- Detroit Lubricator Co. v. ToussaintDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1944
- New Wrinkle, Inc. v. FritzDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.