Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Wikholm

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1946No. L. A. 19504PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Alex Jacobson and Eser Wikholm, the defendant, were copartners in a general construction business from 1940 until the death of the former, February 13, 1944. Defendant, as the surviving partner, retained possession of the partnership assets and proceeded with the settlement of its affairs. (Prob. Code, § 571.) The partnership’s only pending contract concerned a construction job for the federal government at Blythe, California, which job involved the erection of an army air base consisting of a squadron hangar, a subdepot hangar, and an ammunition storage building. The work had been commenced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grigg v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Bracht v. ConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Cahill v. HaffNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Griggs v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Little v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Geron ex rel. Thelen LLP v. Robinson & Cole LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Estate of PeeblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Jay v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Chazan v. MostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API