Legal Opinion

Francis v. Fitzpatrick

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 1937No. 6572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This case is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the appellees as defendants below. The action was in tort for negligence. The sole question presented by the assignment of errors is as to the correctness of an instruction given the jury. Hereinafter the appellant will be referred to as plaintiff and the appellees as defendants.

The plaintiff was injured, it was alleged, while riding as a passenger in a taxicab owned and operated by the defendants as joint adventurers, the taxicab being driven for them by an agent. It was proceeding east on F Street, N. W., and was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Johnson v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Casto v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Barnes v. BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Bland v. HersheyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Capital Transit Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Warner v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  3. Publix Cab Company v. FesslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Bell Cab Co. v. CoppridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API