Legal Opinion

Publix Cab Company v. Fessler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 24, 1959No. 18240PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiff in error, Publix Cab Company, seeks reversal of a judgment of the district court entered in *549favor of the defendant in error, Fessler, the plaintiff in the district court. Publix had filed a Third Party Complaint against Denver-Chicago Trucking Company, also a defendant in error here; the trial court dismissed this latter complaint, and the propriety of this action is also before us on this review. The third party complaint by Publix sought indemnity from Denver-Chicago for any damages which • the plaintiff might recover. This was grounded upon the theory that as between Publix and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Otis Elevator Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  2. Parrish v. De RemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. Western Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1874
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railroad v. SheanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Interstate Bakeries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  2. Widmyer v. Southeast Skyways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bedee v. American Medical Response of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Fischer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hadley Auto TransportDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API