Legal Opinion
Warner v. Capital Transit Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 10, 1958No. Civ. A. 417-56PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
In the form of a request for the submission of a special interrogatory to the jury, the defendant Capital Transit Company asserts a right of indemnity against its co-defendant in the event that both defendants are held liable in this action to recover damages for personal injuries. The question to be determined by the Court at this juncture is whether such a right of indemnity exists.
The plaintiff was a passenger on a bus of the defendant Capital Transit Company. The plaintiff claims that as a result of a sudden stop made by the bus, she was thrown and sustained…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- George's Radio, Inc. v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Knell v. FeltmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Hecht Co., Inc. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Williams v. Capital Transit Co. Williams v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Capital Transit Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Security Insurance Co. v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
- EARLY SETTLERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. SchweidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- District of Columbia v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ling Jones v. Charles James Schramm, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.