Legal Opinion

In Re Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1927No. Docket No. 1454PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an application for the release of petitioner on habeas corpus for the reason that he was not brought to trial within sixty days from the filing of the information, as provided in subdivision 2 of section 1382 of the Penal Code. The petition shows that the information was filed on August 6, 1926; and thereafter, without objection by petitioner, was set for trial for October 6, 1926, that on October 6, 1926, petitioner made a motion to dismiss because he was not brought to trial within the sixty-day period, which motion was denied; that after trial and a verdict of guilty the court on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. RongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ex Parte ApakeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. MageeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. BillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Cody v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. CryderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API