Ex Parte Apakean
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.
The petitioner, charged with the crime of felony, to wit, grand larceny, seeks his discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus. He alleges in his petition that he was arraigned upon said charge upon the fourth day of May, 1923; that upon the seventeenth day of May, 1923, he entered a plea of not guilty; that thereafter, and on June 16, 1923, the cause was set for trial for the twenty-fifth day of July, 1923; that on said twenty-fifth day of July, 1923, when the cause was called for trial, petitioner appeared with his counsel and answered “ready”; that the district attorney requested and obtained a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Silcox v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex parte FennessyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Randolph v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. MitsunagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.