Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 26, 2011No. 149, September Term 2009PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.

Petitioner Enoch Jermaine Hill stands convicted of the crimes of sexual abuse of a minor, second degree sexual offense, and unnatural or perverted sexual practice. Those convictions were based, in part, on the admission into evidence of two statements he made to the police during their investigation of the crimes. Petitioner sought suppression of the statements before trial, claiming that both statements were obtained in violation of Maryland’s common law rule that a statement by the accused that is the product of improper police inducement is involuntary and, thus, inadmissible.

Petitioner…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Gill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Hof v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Teixeira v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Madrid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API