Legal Opinion

State v. Knuckles

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 2003No. 25667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BURNETT:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. Knuckles, 348 S.C. 593, 560 S.E.2d 426 (Ct.App.2002). We reverse.

FACTS

The relevant facts are uncontested. Harold D. Knuckles (“Knuckles”) pled guilty to a 1998 indictment for driving under the influence, second offense, in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 56-5-2930. The Court of Appeals held the indictment insufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction and vacated Knuckles’ conviction.

ISSUE

Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling the indictment did not confer subject matter jurisdiction?

DISCUSSION

Knuckles…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KerrCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. OsborneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. SalisburySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Winns v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API