Legal Opinion

State v. Salisbury

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 16, 2001No. 25230PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

TOAL, Chief Justice:

Elliott G. Salisbury, Jr. (“Salisbury”) appeals the Court of Appeals’ decision he was not entitled to a circumstantial evidence jury charge at his trial for driving under the influence (“DUI”). We affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

At Salisbury’s trial for DUI, the State’s case consisted of the following evidence. In Dorchester County on December 23, 1995, three Highway Patrol troopers observed Salisbury exceeding the speed limit in his pickup truck and crossing the center line of the road on three occasions. When Salisbury was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. GripponSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. State v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. KnucklesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API