Legal Opinion
State v. . Henderson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 31, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.
In Myers v. Earnhardt, 202 N. C., 49, 161 S. E., 715, it is said:
“The practice of suspending judgments in criminal prosecutions, upon terms that are reasonable and just, or staying executions therein for a time, with the consent of the defendant, has so long prevailed in our courts of general jurisdiction that it may now be considered established, both by custom and judicial decision, as a part of the permissible procedure in such cases. S. v. Edwards, 192 N. C., 321, 133 S. E., 37; S. v. Everitt, 164 N. C., 399, 79 S. E., 274; S. v. Hilton, 151 N. C., 687, 65 S. E., 1011.”
This practice has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. WindhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Basile v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.