Legal Opinion
Basile v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 18, 1944No. 176PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
An employee of appellant was injured in the course of his employment, made claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the District of Columbia,1 and was awarded $2,798.50 for disability benefits, plus medical expenses of $392.74, less $101.70 paid by appellant prior to the hearing, or a total of $3,089.54. In the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner it developed that appellant had failed to carry insurance securing the payment of compensation as required by law. He did not pay the award and it was reduced to judgment in the District Court of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- People v. LippnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.