Legal Opinion
Tumpson v. Farina
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 2, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
We granted certification, — N.J.-(1990), to consider the validity of a referendum question proposed to the voters of the City of Hoboken, calling for the repeal of a December 7, 1989, ordinance authorizing execution of a municipal development agreement and lease between the City of Hoboken and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Plaintiffs sought repeal of the ordinance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:69A-185, which grants the power of referendum to the voters in a Faulkner Act municipality. N.J.S.A. 40:69A-1 to -210. The statute defines the voters’ power of referendum as the power “to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- TP. OF SPARTA v. SpillaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- CUPROWSKI v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Cuprowski v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Eastern Paralyzed Veterans Ass'n v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- In Re Certain Petitions for Binding ReferendumNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re Ordinance 04-75Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- City of Ocean City v. SomervilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- We the People v. City of ElizabethNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- In Re Referendum Petition to Repeal Ordinance 04-75New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.