Legal Opinion

In Re Ordinance 04-75

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 26, 2007PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

The Legislature has conferred on the voters of Faulkner Act municipalities, 1 such as Trenton, “the power of referendum,” the right to test a challenged ordinance in the crucible of the democratic process. See N.J.S.A. 40:69A-185. When a referendum petition is properly filed, the voters have the final say in approving or rejecting an ordinance at the ballot box.

In this case, the Trenton City Council enacted Ordinance 04-75, which established a new organizational table for the police depart ment and set a salary range for the chief of administrative services. A Trenton citizens group filed a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Summer v. Township of TeaneckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. CUPROWSKI v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  5. Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Daniel Tumpson v. James Farina (072813)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Graves v. North Eastern Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In Re Referendum on City of Trenton Ordinance 09-02Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. Hon. Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman(073567)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  5. Graves v. No. E. Services Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API