Legal Opinion
Cuprowski v. City of Jersey City
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 16, 1968PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
103 N.J. Super. 217 (1968)
247 A.2d 28
PAUL CUPROWSKI, MARY E. VERDIRANO, JAMES J. MACK, FRANK S. MONACO, AND JEROME LAZARUS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND WILLIAM P. BLACK, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 8, 1968.
Decided October 16, 1968.
Before Judges GAULKIN, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Gerold Kanengiser argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Gordon and Kanengiser, attorneys).
Mr. James F. Ryan argued the cause for respondents…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- CUPROWSKI v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- X. v. Y.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
3Cited by30 opinions
- Shapiro v. Essex Cty. Freeholder Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- TP. OF SPARTA v. SpillaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- In Re Ordinance 04-75Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Sea Girt Restaurant & Tavern Owners Ass'n v. Borough of Sea GirtDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- D'Ercole v. MAYOR & COUNCIL, ETC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.