State v. Outlaw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The question posed by this appeal is whether a defendant may be impeached by requiring him to answer a question as to whether he has been convicted of another crime when his plea of no contest to such a crime has been accepted. N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 609(a) provides:
For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than 60 days confinement shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination or thereafter.
The resolution of this appeal depends on whether the phrase…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- In Re StiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Winesett v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. HiattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Davis v. HiattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.