Legal Opinion

State v. Outlaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1990No. 324A89PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The question posed by this appeal is whether a defendant may be impeached by requiring him to answer a question as to whether he has been convicted of another crime when his plea of no contest to such a crime has been accepted. N.C.G.S. § 8C-1, Rule 609(a) provides:

For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that he has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than 60 days confinement shall be admitted if elicited from him or established by public record during cross-examination or thereafter.

The resolution of this appeal depends on whether the phrase…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. In Re StiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Winesett v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. HiattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. Davis v. HiattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API