Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hiatt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1990No. 155PA89PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The appellant argues first that the superior court did not have jurisdiction to determine the questions raised in the petition. We agree with the Court of Appeals that the suspension of the petitioner’s driving privilege was mandatory under N.C.G.S. § 20-17(2) and N.C.G.S. § 2049(e) and the petitioner did not have the right to appeal under N.C.G.S. § 20-25. Underwood v. Howland, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 274 N.C. 473, 164 S.E.2d 2 (1968); Fox v. Scheidt, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 241 N.C. 31, 84 S.E.2d 259 (1954).

We do not agree with the Court of Appeals that the petitioner has a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Fox v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. In Re StiersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. House of Raeford Farms, Inc. v. City of RaefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. PettyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Cole v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Craig v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API