Legal Opinion

State v. Petty

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1990No. 9018SC168PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

We note initially that defendant did not properly preserve for appeal either issue on which he now relies. N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure 10(b)(1), 10(b)(3). However, the Court may hear appeals in its discretion under Rule 2 of the N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure and we do so now.

L

Defendant first contends that his conviction and sentence as a habitual felon violated due process because the State’s evidence to support the charge was insufficient as a matter of law where (a) the State failed to prove that defendant had been convicted of or pled guilty to three felony…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. HairstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Forsyth Municipal Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. FoldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Bosley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API