Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, J., pro tem.
The trial court sustained the defendants’ demurrers to each cause of action of the amended complaint without leave to amend; and subsequently denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the amended complaint; and thereupon entered judgment “that plaintiff take nothing in the above cause ’ ’. Plaintiff appealed from this judgment.
A brief réswmé of the executive orders and the legislation involved is essential to an understanding of the pleadings herein and the controversy arising therefrom. President Taft, on September 27, 1909, July 2, 1910, December 30, 1910, and on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Kinney-Coastal Oil Co. v. KiefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Reno Livestock Corp. v. Sun Oil Co.(Delaware)Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Holbrook v. Continental Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1955
- Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Wall v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- California v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.