Legal Opinion

Hillock v. Traders Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1884PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Isabella. (Hart, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance against loss by fire, bearing date July 24, 1882, and covering the building known as the St. James Hotel in the village of Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, which was destroyed by fire August 29, 1882. The amount of insurance was one thousand dollars.. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the circuit court.

The grounds of defense on the merits are principally the-following:

1. That neither Hillock, the plaintiff, as trustee, nor Brown & Leaton, as beneficiaries, had such title or interest. *533in tbe property as was represented when they applied for tbe insurance.

2.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Valkenburgh v. . Lenox Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Home Insurance v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gately-Haire Co. v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Quoug Tue Sing v. Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Roberta Manufacturing Co. v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Ohran v. National Automobile Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Eicher-Woodland Co. v. Buffalo Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API