Legal Opinion
Whitcomb v. Wright
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 25, 1929No. 27,043PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from orders sustaining special and general demurrers to their complaint.
Plaintiffs are husband and wife. It will serve convenience to refer to J ames Edgar Whitcomb as the only plaintiff. Construing the complaint liberally, its purpose is to annul a trust deed wherein defendants Vernon A. and C. R. Wright are the trustees. The other defendants are joined because with plaintiff they are beneficiaries of the trust. Plaintiff is the son of Silas Whitcomb and his wife, Carrie A. Whitcomb. Silas died in 1868. Thereafter the mother married George B. Wright;' so plaintiff became…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardt v. HeidweyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Duxbury v. BoiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harold L. Warner v. First National Bank of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
- Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Olesen v. RetzlaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Cherry v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Modern Life Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.