Legal Opinion

Olesen v. Retzlaff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1931No. 28,340PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 238 N.W. 12, 239 N.W. 672. Action against the defendants, who were directors of the State Bank of Lamberton. There are six causes of action. The first five are to recover money deposited by the plaintiff in the bank at various times when, so it is alleged, the bank was unsafe and insolvent as the defendants knew or had good reason to know. The sixth is a common count for money had and received. There was an original and an amended complaint. The defendants demurred to the amended complaint. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants appeal.

1. The action was commenced March…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Morrill v. Little Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Baxter v. CoughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Heimgaertner v. Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Adams v. Little Missouri Minerals AssociationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Burzinski v. Kinyon Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. Stern v. National City Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API