Saylor v. Greenville Steel Car Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
On the testimony of claimant and one medical expert, the referee made an award for the specific loss of use of claimant’s left eye, under §306(c) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act as amended June 21,1939, P. L. 520, 77 PS §513. The board affirmed, and the court entered judgment on the award. The questions are: Was there an accident and, if so, is the testimony legally sufficient to establish a causal connection between the accident and total loss of sight?
Claimant for some years had been employed 'by Green-ville Steel Car Company and on July 1, 1941 was a helper on a press…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Davis v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Tabuteau v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Florig v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Meehan v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Seidel v. Yeadon BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Gaffey v. John J. Felin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Boyle v. BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.