Legal Opinion

Seabrook v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 12, 1930No. 13025PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Beease.

While agreeing with most of the conclusions contained in the opinion of Mr. Justice Cothran, I do not agree with him as to what I conceive to be one important matter; and, for that reason, I am of the opinion that the order of the Circuit Judge should be affirmed.

In his complaint, with regard to the intention and purpose of the defendant power company to condemn and take for its use a certain portion of the plaintiffs lands, he alleged “that the said threatened acts of the defendant will constitute wanton and illegal trespass upon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  2. Alston v. LimehouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Columbia Water Power Co. v. NunamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. Georgia, Railway Co. v. RidlehuberSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  5. Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  3. Sease v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Tuomey Hospital v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API