Legal Opinion

Iamartino v. Avallone

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 7, 1983No. (2340)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

This is an appeal 1 from two judgments of strict foreclosure rendered by the trial court. The plaintiffs commenced two separate mortgage foreclosure actions against the defendants: one, in the judicial district of Danbury, concerns a lot and house in Brookfield; the other, in the judicial district of Litchfield, concerns unimproved real property in New Milford. The action filed in Litchfield was transferred to Danbury and the two cases were consolidated for trial.

The plaintiffs’ mortgages on both parcels were junior to first mortgages. At oral argument on this appeal we were informed that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. State National Bank v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Arcari v. DellaripaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Focus Investment Associates, Inc. v. American Title Insurance Company, Focus Investment Associates, Inc. v. American Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Edart Truck Rental Corp. v. B. Swirsky & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API