Legal Opinion

Rea v. . Simowitz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Counsel for defendants, exercising the care of diligent attorneys, duly entered motions to dismiss as in case of nonsuit. Having examined the record in the calm which follows the heat of battle, they frankly admit the evidence of negligence was such as to require its submission to a jury and abandon their, exceptions to the refusal of the court below to dismiss.

They now rely principally on exceptions to the charge of the court. These exceptions present two questions which require discussion: (1) Is it proper or permissible for the court to instruct the jury to consider our mortuary table in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Kaleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Turner v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Rajnowski v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Greene v. Mitchell County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Nance v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Jackson v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API