Legal Opinion

Binkley v. Switzer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 1, 1923No. 10,430PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Teller

Plaintiff in error brought a suit against defendant in error seeking thereby to be adjudged owner of a two-fifths interest in certain realty claimed and held by the defendant. The circumstances under which the cause arose are fully set forth in Binkley v. Switzer, 69 Colo. 176, 192 Pac. 500. On the second trial the court found for the defendant and entered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff brings error.

The trial court held that the defendant was entitled to the land under the seven-year statute of limitation under color of title; the will of one Weston, under which both parties claimed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GroesbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Binkley v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. PachecoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Green v. TrumbullNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Page v. ElwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  4. Westlake v. WestlakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  5. v. Spalding RehabilitationColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API