Binkley v. Switzer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action by plaintiff in error asking to be adjudged the owner and entitled to the possession of certain real estate. Judgment for defendant. Error to the District Court of Chaffee County, Hon. James L. Cooper, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff in an action against defendant in error in which he sought to be adjudged the owner, and entitled to the possession of certain real estate in possession of the defendant. The court found for the defendant, and entered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff brings error.
The facts necessary to be considered in this cause are briefly as follows: One Philo Weston,.by his will, devised to his wife, Mary Weston, an undivided half of all his estate, for life; remainder over to his brother and his *178sister, and to three children of his wife by a former marriage. The residue of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Unfried v. HebererIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Burns & Smith Lumber Co. v. DoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Turner v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Anderson v. GroesbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Leary v. Waterbury Title Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- McClure v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Blatt v. BlattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Binkley v. SwitzerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- A.R.A. Manufacturing Co. v. Brady Auto Accessories, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.