Legal Opinion
State v. Shamp
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 1988No. C0-87-1494PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
An Otter Tail County jury convicted appellant on one count of criminal sexual conduct on February 25, 1987, in connection with the sexual abuse of his sister. Appellant argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it failed to caution the jury that acts occurring outside of the statute of limitations period could not be considered as part of multiple acts of abuse for purposes of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. l(h)(v). We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
On July 24,1986, a complaint was filed in Otter Tail County charging appellant, William Romain Shamp (D.O.B.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. HardimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. BironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. OrscaninSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. ShampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Thakkar v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. GliddenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.