Legal Opinion
State v. Glidden
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1990No. C8-89-1019PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant Stephanie Ann Glidden was convicted of theft of property with an aggregate value exceeding $2,500 after the jury had been explicitly directed to consider evidence spanning an eleven and one-half month period. Because the statute allowing aggregation to reach the $2,500 threshold limits the aggregation period to six months, appellant’s conviction must be reversed.
*332FACTS
Under Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 3(7) (1988) the period of time over which the value of stolen property may be aggregated in order to meet the statutory thresholds is limited to six months. In this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cabana v. BullockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MalaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. GliddenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. GliddenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990