State v. Orscanin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Defendant, David Orscanin, appeals from an order of the district court denying his request to have his judgment of conviction and sentence vacated and set aside. The district court decision was made following a postconviction hearing held pursuant to our remand of a prior appeal. The chief issue raised is whether defendant’s confession was voluntary and therefore admissible. Upon a careful reading of the record, we hold that defendant’s confession was voluntary. We therefore affirm.
On September 28,1976, defendant Orsca-nin was sentenced to a 0- to 5-year prison term…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. BironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. PersingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- People v. ConteMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.